Hairstyles

Sophisticated Hairstyle Guide is unique in its use very liberal and very consistent gun. It is much more extreme than just the removal of a scar or a pimple. All women in every single recent issue, it seems, has been remarkably airbrush. It is unclear whether the changes were automated in Photoshop, or if someone was asked to go through each image and make the changes manually. In any case, the editors do not allow any pictures with spots on the face even though it is a magazine about makeup and hair or skin care. There is no obvious sign of any hair have been manipulated.

Most women are young, so it makes little sense. It is as if we are eliminating wrinkles. Why does everyone have to be Photoshop and faces more work? Many of the small images are not close, but they are improved. Does this not have a negative impact on women pushing perfection as the standard (unreachable)? One suspects that the motivation is simply to avoid offending the stars by the publication of images which are not entirely flattering. But it is neither normal nor necessary, because any hairstyle magazines others do in an extreme way. This makes the women look artificial.